It appears that you have a subscription in your cart as well as other products. If you checkout you will be purchasing more products than necessary, since the subscription allows you to download unlimited products.
We recommend you either remove the extra products and come back to them after you subscribe, or remove the subscription and just checkout with the products.
Home›Motion to Dismiss - Sexual Assault of a Minor - Response; Rittenberg Buffen Gulbrandsen Robinson & Saks LTD; 09.15.2016
Motion to Dismiss - Sexual Assault of a Minor - Response; Rittenberg Buffen Gulbrandsen Robinson & Saks LTD; 09.15.2016
Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Sexual Assault of a Minor
Case Topics: Sexual Abuse of a Minor, Assault and/or Battery, Infliction of Emotional Distress, Negligence, Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Grounds for Moving: Employee was not acting in the course and scope of her employment when engaged in off-campus sexual activities with Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have failed to plead a factual basis for claims against the school district. Hiring and firing decisions and failing to supervise activities are protected by the discretionary immunity found in Local Government Tort Immunity Act. Tort Immunity Act provides immunity for the alleged failure to detect or prevent commission of a crime and bars claims.
Moving to Dismiss the Following Claims: Negligence, Breach of Fiduciary Duty